NFL: Preseason. Eagles' Power Ranking: 1: "The Eagles are absolutely loaded. Anything less than a Super Bowl win will be disappointing."
- Bleacher Report, NFL Power Rankings, August 1, 2011
NFL: Week 6. Eagles' Power Ranking: 20: "Is there anything better than watching a hyped-up team fall flat on its face? Between the Miami Heat and the Eagles, 2011 has been a good year for schadenfreude."
- Bleacher Report, NFL Power Rankings, October 10, 2011
*
NFL: Preseason: 49ers' Power Ranking: 25: "The 49ers may field a team in 2011 very similar to 2010 edition of this team, which means another 6 - 10 record is not out of the question. Trusting Alex Smith for one more year seems like a worthless transaction."
- Bleacher Report, NFL Power Rankings, August 1, 2011
NFL: Week 6: 49ers Power Ranking, 3: "NFL Coach of the Year: Jim Harbaugh. NFL Comeback Player of the Year: Alex Smith. Give credit to Jed York and Trent Baalke for trusting Harbaugh to re-sign Alex Smith at quarterback."
- Bleacher Report, NFL Power Rankings, October 10, 2011
*
NFL analysts have a hard time analyzing the NFL. Like Bleacher Report (above), ESPN publishes 'NFL Power Rankings' every week. Of the teams that made ESPN's Preseason Top 10, only five remain ranked in the Top 10 at the end of Week 7. Four teams have been demoted from the Top 10 in dramatic fashion, by an average of 16 positions each (Jets, Falcons, Eagles, Colts). Three teams have been promoted to the Top 10 in dramatic fashion, by an average of 18 positions each (Lions, Bills, 49ers). As the NFL has only 32 teams, promotions and demotions of this magnitude indicate that the corresponding predictions were dead wrong (excluding the Colts, who last their franchise player to injury). ESPN's only preseason predictions that have held up through Week 7---the Packers (1) and Patriots (2)---required minimal expert analysis: The Packers won the Super Bowl last season, and the Patriots are perennially favored to win the Super Bowl.
I am not suggesting that ESPN and Bleacher Report are hiring incompetent NFL analysts. I am suggesting that American football is sufficiently complicated that it is difficult even for experts to predict how well a particualr team will perform in a particular season. Among other variables that an expert must consider:
- the intangibles of a player (See http://bleacherreport.com/articles/338933-the-manningleaf-debate-what-could-h...; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmH27scihL0);
- the chemistry of a team (See http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-07-28/haynesworth-will-be-patriots...>
- the strength of a team's schedule (See http://www.betvega.com/nfl-strength-of-schedule/); and
- the complexity of the sport itself (See below for a defensive play from Dick LeBeau's playbook):
Of course, American football is not the only sport where predictions feel like guesses. Experts struggle to make accurate predictions even in the sport that elevated statistical analysis to divine status, Major League Baseball. Take the 2011 preseason predictions of Sports Illustrated's Twelve 'Baseball Experts': One of twelve predicted that the Texas Rangers would reach the World Series. Zero of twelve predicted that the St. Louis Cardinals would.
Fortunately for professional sports teams, outcomes of professional sports are decided on fields, not in columns. Which is why, every year, dozens of professional teams go from rags in columns to riches on fields---and, subsequently, riches in columns. All it takes is a team that has talent, that knows it has talent, and that is not discouraged by predictions to the contrary by experts. The last requirement, not being discouraged by naysayers, is the hardest one of all. It requires an almost psychotic belief in yourself and an equally psychotic disbelief of others. It requires the ability to read a headline that says, "You are going to fail," and to think, "Wrong. I am going to succeed."
Not surprisingly, the leaders of teams that defy preseason predictions, like Jim Harbaugh of the 49ers, are oftentimes almost (read: clearly) psychotic:
http://deadspin.com/5850301/watch-jim-harbaugh-and-jim-schwartz-almost-fight
*
In several respects, the relationship between sports teams and sports experts is similar to the relationship between start-ups and investors:
- It is difficult to predict how a particular start-up will fare. This is true even when that start-up (a) raises $41 million; (b) is backed by Sequoia; (c) has a team with successful entrepreneurial experience; and (d) receives the highest praise a start-up ever has received, from Doug Leone himself: "Just as the iPone changed everything about mobile phones, Color will transform the way people communicate with each other. Once or twice a decade a company emerges from Silicon Valley that can change everything. Color is one of those companies" (For Scoble's take, see http://scobleizer.com/2011/04/01/the-funding-and-failures-of-color-silicon-va....
- Because it is difficult to predict how a start-up will fare, even start-up experts---venture capital firms---have a hard time making such predictions. Examples abound: A reputable Boston-based VC, Battery Ventures, turned down Facebook in 2004 because it did not look different to them than Friendster, a company in which they already had invested (See http://news.yahoo.com/boston-venture-capitalists-ponder-facebook-billions-mis.... Bessemer Ventures, the oldest venture capital firm in the country, passed on, among other companies, Apple, eBay, Federal Express, Google, Intel and Paypal (See http://www.bvp.com/Portfolio/AntiPortfolio.aspx). Many of the most highly-respected venture capital firms have simply removed themselves from the business of making predictions. Instead, they wait for other firms' predictions to prove right or wrong, and then they invest. As a partner at a world-class VC told me about the simplicity of his decision-making process, "A monkey could do my job." For later-stage VC's, the process of predicting winners is equivalent to an NFL analyst waiting until the fourth quarters of the AFC and NFC championship games before making his or her Super Bowl prediction.
- Given the above, a start-up must not be discouraged by the predictions of investors, which predictions oftentimes take the form of decisions not to invest. Myne has been fortunate enough that over a dozen investors have predicted that we will succeed, but a dozen other investors have predicted otherwise. We have become accomplished at ignoring those predictions. We understand that the world we are entering is sufficiently complex that every prediction of our success, in our favor or not, is meaningless compared to our own belief that we can, and will, succeed. That belief is critical. If success is 99% execution, execution is 99% belief. It is belief in our success, not just caffeine, that gives us the energy to work eighty-hour weeks, month after month. It is belief in your success that impassions us to build and maintain a team that believes as strongly as we do in our success. It is belief in our success that allows us to turn potholes, roadblocks and detours into ever-increasing determination to reach our destination. It belief in our success that turns sky-searching uncertainty into "the sky is the $%@! limit."
We leave it to Myne's secure recesses whether the leaders of our team are as psychotic as Jim Harbaugh. But we are comfortable revealing that we believe in our success as much as Jim Harbaugh believes in the San Francisco 49ers. And we put as little stock in the predictions of others that he does.
So, if you want to make a prediction on Myne, go to Myne.com; "Predict" is our most popular game.






























